May 1, 2004
LOG OUT
Main
  Synopsis
  Choosing an effective effectiveness test
  Dollar offset – simple but problematic
  Case study: Comparing effectiveness methodologies
  Statistical methods: The popular approach
  What are vendors offering?
  Is there a perfect effectiveness test?
  Looking forward
  Conclusion
The Ripple Effect with Prospective Effectiveness Problems Involving IAS 39
November 21, 2003
A Guide to Understanding FAS 133 Effectiveness Testing: Part I
March 23, 2001
Effectiveness Is Back For DIG’s Dec. Meeting
December 9, 1999
DIG Sheds New Light Despite Power Outage
October 22, 1999
Will They or Won’t They?  
September 16, 1999
Derivatives Accounting (FAS 133/IAS 39)
A Guide to Understanding FAS 133 Effectiveness Testing: Part 2
March 26, 2001

The problem with implementing FAS 133 has always been the disconnect between the front and back office – those doing the trades and those making the accounting entries. The effectiveness test provides the intellectual (and in systems logic, the actual) linkage between the two. However it is only effective if handled correctly.

This two-part FAS133.com Special Report addresses the issue of how to assess effectiveness in a way that’s consistent with finance theory and risk management objectives. Part 1 addresses the issues of FAS 133 effectiveness requirements, when effectiveness matters and why. Part 2 outlines the available methodologies and alternative methodologies, addressing the issue of how to choose the most appropriate test.

NEXT
 


All rights reserved. Copyright © 1999-2004 The NeuGroup, publisher of TreasuryCompliance.com
Privacy policy | Agreement for web access | Contact us


  Top