May 1, 2004
LOG OUT
Main
  Synopsis
  Choosing an effective effectiveness test
  Dollar offset – simple but problematic
  Case study: Comparing effectiveness methodologies
  Statistical methods: The popular approach
  What are vendors offering?
  Is there a perfect effectiveness test?
  Looking forward
  Conclusion
The Ripple Effect with Prospective Effectiveness Problems Involving IAS 39
November 21, 2003
A Guide to Understanding FAS 133 Effectiveness Testing: Part I
March 23, 2001
Effectiveness Is Back For DIG’s Dec. Meeting
December 9, 1999
DIG Sheds New Light Despite Power Outage
October 22, 1999
Will They or Won’t They?  
September 16, 1999
Derivatives Accounting (FAS 133/IAS 39)
A Guide to Understanding FAS 133 Effectiveness Testing: Part 2
March 26, 2001

Conclusion – a checklist

Effectiveness is the core of FAS 133. Whether or not a hedge is expected to qualify under whatever test a company chooses to run prospectively will determine the application of special accounting. It’s therefore, important that companies understand the alternative methodologies and test their selected approach on their hedges before making the designation. Once a test methodology is elected for a particular set of hedges, it cannot be changed no matter how unattractive the results.

Some methods, like the dollar offset, are simple but may end up generating more ineffectiveness than other methods – mostly statistical. So, in electing the test for prospective and actual measurement of effectiveness (remember, the same test need not be elected for both), companies must consider the following:

(1)     Do you want a liberal or conservative test?  i.e., will the test be used solely for accounting/reporting or will it also be utilized for measuring risk management goals?

(2)     What sort of test fits the particular hedge strategy being employed?  Some strategies are unlikely to generate much noise, other “ineffectiveness-prone” strategies are. Statistical tests are probably the best ones for anything other than “perfect” hedges.

(3)     What time period to use in making the assessment? Cumulative changes are often better at smoothing out daily volatilities.

(4)     What are the tests contained within the existing risk management or accounting software package? Some vendors offer only basic testing. If dollar offset is less than what you need, you may need an add-on, analytical tool or else a different package.

(5)     What will your auditors accept? Different auditors will have different approval levels. Some may have particular regression variables that they find acceptable for particular hedges.

(6)     Is an alternative test, such as VRM, needed? Some companies are less averse to new methods, particularly when these might allow them to continue their economic hedge programs. Others would rather wait for market standards to evolve.

(7)     Finally, how much volatility in income is acceptable? No matter what methodology is used, some hedges will generate ineffectiveness. Examining the overall impact on the P/(L) will help quantify what movement can be expected. If the volatility proves too much, there are steps companies can take to mitigate that impact using hedge instruments, or by adjusting the notional amount of their hedges.


NEXT
 


All rights reserved. Copyright © 1999-2004 The NeuGroup, publisher of TreasuryCompliance.com
Privacy policy | Agreement for web access | Contact us


  Top