May 2, 2004
LOG OUT
Will IAS 39 Lead to a Revival of SPE Strategies?
January 16, 2004
SEC Staff Warns About FIN 46 Compliance
December 18, 2003
A Liability, By Any Other Name
November 14, 2003
Avoiding Reputational/Legal Risk 'Time Bombs'
October 14, 2003
FIN 46: Broader Deferral Wins the Day (After All)
October 8, 2003
SPEs (FIN 46/FAS 140)
SPEs of Old vs. VIEs and Changes to FIN 46
December 18, 2003

Recent moves by the FASB in response to negative comment on FIN 46 follow a familiar pattern.

Scope creep is often a problem when accounting guidance attempts to tackle complex problems like off-balance sheet entities or derivatives. Just like when FAS 133 was first introduced to put all derivatives on the balance sheet almost everything came to be viewed as a potential derivative (or something with a potential derivative embedded in it); so too has FIN 46’s effort to put off-balance sheet entities (SPEs) on someone’s balance sheet ended up casting a wide net. The FASB’s initial attempts to define SPEs as Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), subject to consolidation tests that would put such structures on the balance sheets of their primary beneficiaries, similarly and, arguably, purposefully cast a wide net with a tight mesh, so as to not let any sought after fish get away.

After considerable push back from firms who did think they had anything resembling SPEs (including many franchise operations), like with FAS 133's derivatives, the scope of entities subject to FIN 46 is being refined. In particular, those so-called VIEs that are established for a business purposes, e.g., JVs and franchises, and not as financial structures, distinguishing them from what the SEC’s Chief Accountant calls “the SPEs of old,” have been reconsidered and the non-SPEs will now be scoped out for the most part. Further, constinuents will have more time to make sense of the changes, but only for non-SPE VIEs (see deferral of effective date below).

SPEs or “SPEs of old” have now been "defined" by the FASB as those entities to which enterprises would have previously applied the relevant accounting literature for pre FIN 46 SPEs, which would include EITF Issue No.’s 90-15, 96-20, 97-1, and Topic No. D-14.

This is an important and instructive outcome, showing how the FASB allows comment (and other forms of constituent input) to come up with logical counterarguments to its tentative guidance, which tends to narrow and loosen the wide and tight nets it casts in response to calls to improve financial reporting. All the more reason that due process is important and comment by knowledgeable constituents is critical.

The scope change and other modifications to FIN 46 will be issued shortly in a new FIN 46-R. To help everyone involved make sense of these changes, and the FSP that continue to be issued, the effective date for FIN 46-R has been delayed, until the end of Q1/04 for most firms (see below). However, and it is an important one, the application of FIN 46 to “SPE’s of old” has not been delayed--much to the dismay of the Bond Market Association/American Securization Forum and others. The effectiveness of comment and the ability to change the FASB's collective mind does have its limits.

 

Major scope change

At the December 10 board meeting, the FASB came to the significant decision to scope out many of the business-oriented VIEs from FIN 46. Per the FASB’s release, the Board decided to:


Provide that an enterprise need not apply Interpretation 46 to an entity that is a business as to be defined in the final Interpretation, unless one of more of the following conditions exist, (Other generally accepted accounting principles would apply to such entities):

  1. The reporting enterprise and its related parties* were involved in the formation of the entity. However, this condition would not apply if the entity is an operating joint venture under joint control of the reporting enterprise and one or more independent parties [franchises will be included as well in this exception, per the December 17 meeting].
  2. Substantially all of the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of the reporting enterprise or its related parties.
  3. The reporting enterprise and its related parties provide more than half of the equity, subordinated debt or other forms of subordinated financial support to the entity.
  4. The activities of the entity primarily relate to securitizations, leasing arrangements, or other forms of asset-backed financing.

 

*The term related parties as used in this list of conditions refers to all parties identified in paragraph 16, except de facto agents under item 16 (d)(i).

 

 

Deferral of effective date

In conjunction with the scope out and other revisions to FIN 46 in FIN 46-R, the FASB agreed to Board Member Ed Trott’s proposal to establish three buckets of firms--public entities, public small business entities and non-public entities, with different deferrals.

As a result most firms will have roughly a quarter to digest, implement and have audited their application of the revised, FIN 46-R. Since for most SPE’s of old the changes in FIN 46-R are negligible, the FASB sees this as a realistic proposition. [Leslie Seidman and George Batavick, however, continue to hold dissenting views, suggesting that the FIN 46-R changes are far from trivial and believe the effective date for SPEs should be deferred as well. Ms. Seidman points to changes in guidance touching on derivatives, service contracts and equity investment treatment that may take a significant amount of time for constituents to digest. She is also concerned, for example, that divergence in market practice for expected return/loss calculations may cause different conclusions on VIE consolidation tests to be reached across firms.]

Non-small business public entities will still have to apply FIN 46, or early adopt FIN 46-R, for all SPEs created prior to February 1, 2003 at the end of the first interim or annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2003. Unless the entity decides to early adopt FIN 46-R, its provisions must be applied as of the end of the first interim or annual reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. For all other VIEs that still fall within the scope of FIN 46-R and were created prior to February 1, 2003, non-small business public entities must adopt FIN 46-R at the end of the first interim or annual reporting period ending after March 15, 2004 (they may also elect to early adopt the revised guidance at year end).  The same holds true for all entities (SPEs of old or not) created after January 31, 2003 that were required to be accounted for under FIN 46: FIN 46 will continue to apply, unless they choose to early adopt FIN 46-R, until periods after March 15, 2004, when FIN 46-R applies to all entities.

Public small business entities will have until the end of the first interim or annual period after December 15, 2004, an additional year, to adopt FIN 46-R for SPEs created after January 31, 2003, though they are free to early adopt. Like larger firms, however, they must adopt pre-revision FIN 46 provisions for SPEs created prior to February 1, 2003, but they have until periods after December 15, 2004 to adjust for the FIN 46-R change

 

 

 

 

 


All rights reserved. Copyright © 1999-2004 The NeuGroup, publisher of TreasuryCompliance.com
Privacy policy | Agreement for web access | Contact us


  Top